<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasons I dislike using Microsoft Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michael-wheeler.org/2010/01/21/no-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michael-wheeler.org/2010/01/21/no-windows/</link>
	<description>mmmm bacon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://michael-wheeler.org/2010/01/21/no-windows/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-wheeler.org/?p=425#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Yeah I should of pointed that out. Lazy developers are one of the main reasons I hate Windows. I won&#039;t yet count Power Shell until corporate starts using either 7 or rolls out power shell to all terminals.

Quality of Windows apps are very poor except the few made by either Microsoft or by larger companies (but even they still use weird and wonderful installers). I think the biggest cause for that is the lack of development tools in the beginning without paying or pirating.

OS X provides a nice solution to both lazy developers and  users but just packing everything up into a .app folder. No need for an installer. xCode is pretty epic, and it seems developers are using it to make decent apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I should of pointed that out. Lazy developers are one of the main reasons I hate Windows. I won&#8217;t yet count Power Shell until corporate starts using either 7 or rolls out power shell to all terminals.</p>
<p>Quality of Windows apps are very poor except the few made by either Microsoft or by larger companies (but even they still use weird and wonderful installers). I think the biggest cause for that is the lack of development tools in the beginning without paying or pirating.</p>
<p>OS X provides a nice solution to both lazy developers and  users but just packing everything up into a .app folder. No need for an installer. xCode is pretty epic, and it seems developers are using it to make decent apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Scott</title>
		<link>http://michael-wheeler.org/2010/01/21/no-windows/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-wheeler.org/?p=425#comment-185</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just like to point out that quite a few of the problems that you mentioned have been fixed in more recent versions of Windows (such as the PowerShell). There&#039;s no point whinging about the past, because frankly, MacOS 9 was crap.

Aside from that, I&#039;d also like to make the point that most of your other points aren&#039;t Windows fault. Take for instance the problems of applications having awful installation/removal programs and leaving support files everywhere. Both of these have been addressed in a Microsoft-supported manner (via Windows Installer and the Application Settings folder) since Windows 2000. It&#039;s just that lazy/clueless programmers ignore them.

Really, what you&#039;re complaining about mostly isn&#039;t Windows... it&#039;s lazy and clueless application programmers, which while Microsoft has had their fair share, occur everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to point out that quite a few of the problems that you mentioned have been fixed in more recent versions of Windows (such as the PowerShell). There&#8217;s no point whinging about the past, because frankly, MacOS 9 was crap.</p>
<p>Aside from that, I&#8217;d also like to make the point that most of your other points aren&#8217;t Windows fault. Take for instance the problems of applications having awful installation/removal programs and leaving support files everywhere. Both of these have been addressed in a Microsoft-supported manner (via Windows Installer and the Application Settings folder) since Windows 2000. It&#8217;s just that lazy/clueless programmers ignore them.</p>
<p>Really, what you&#8217;re complaining about mostly isn&#8217;t Windows&#8230; it&#8217;s lazy and clueless application programmers, which while Microsoft has had their fair share, occur everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://michael-wheeler.org/2010/01/21/no-windows/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-wheeler.org/?p=425#comment-184</guid>
		<description>The best part about GNU/Linux, and BSD distro&#039;s is most of it is open source. So if you find a problem, you can fix it yourself. If I find a bug or a problem with Windows, all I can do is submit a bug report and hope that MS listens to me, and releases a patch 3 years later...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best part about GNU/Linux, and BSD distro&#8217;s is most of it is open source. So if you find a problem, you can fix it yourself. If I find a bug or a problem with Windows, all I can do is submit a bug report and hope that MS listens to me, and releases a patch 3 years later&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHOOZLE</title>
		<link>http://michael-wheeler.org/2010/01/21/no-windows/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>PHOOZLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-wheeler.org/?p=425#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I totally agree on all the points you make Michael.

Linux and MacOSX are perfect in my opinion. It&#039;s just everyone else is locked into Windows which makes alternatives almost possible to use on a daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree on all the points you make Michael.</p>
<p>Linux and MacOSX are perfect in my opinion. It&#8217;s just everyone else is locked into Windows which makes alternatives almost possible to use on a daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://michael-wheeler.org/2010/01/21/no-windows/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-wheeler.org/?p=425#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I think that windows, linux and OSX all have their good and bad points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that windows, linux and OSX all have their good and bad points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

